| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| the_efficacy_of | 0.855 | 20536 |
| effectiveness_of | 0.845 | 32347 |
| and_effectiveness_of | 0.766 | 67700 |
| its_effectiveness | 0.761 | 59159 |
| their_effectiveness | 0.751 | 65235 |
| effectiveness | 0.737 | 5254 |
| efficacy_of | 0.720 | 59785 |
| the_usefulness_of | 0.708 | 34775 |
| and_efficacy_of | 0.684 | 58080 |
| efficiency_of | 0.670 | 5753 |
| how_effective | 0.664 | 87974 |
| evaluate_the_effectiveness_of | 0.651 | 80821 |
| the_impact_of | 0.624 | 2285 |
| the_effect_of | 0.609 | 1931 |
| efficacy | 0.608 | 12475 |
| the_feasibility_of | 0.590 | 31863 |
| the_appropriateness_of | 0.588 | 61474 |
| the_applicability_of | 0.580 | 51868 |
| the_potential_benefit_of | 0.575 | 79113 |
| impact_of | 0.573 | 6260 |
| acceptability_of | 0.573 | 72135 |
| the_positive_effect_of | 0.566 | 69951 |
| the_viability_of | 0.564 | 32346 |
| success_of | 0.560 | 1912 |
| the_adequacy_of | 0.558 | 67163 |