Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
the_efficacy_of | 0.855 | 20536 |
effectiveness_of | 0.845 | 32347 |
and_effectiveness_of | 0.766 | 67700 |
its_effectiveness | 0.761 | 59159 |
their_effectiveness | 0.751 | 65235 |
effectiveness | 0.737 | 5254 |
efficacy_of | 0.720 | 59785 |
the_usefulness_of | 0.708 | 34775 |
and_efficacy_of | 0.684 | 58080 |
efficiency_of | 0.670 | 5753 |
how_effective | 0.664 | 87974 |
evaluate_the_effectiveness_of | 0.651 | 80821 |
the_impact_of | 0.624 | 2285 |
the_effect_of | 0.609 | 1931 |
efficacy | 0.608 | 12475 |
the_feasibility_of | 0.590 | 31863 |
the_appropriateness_of | 0.588 | 61474 |
the_applicability_of | 0.580 | 51868 |
the_potential_benefit_of | 0.575 | 79113 |
impact_of | 0.573 | 6260 |
acceptability_of | 0.573 | 72135 |
the_positive_effect_of | 0.566 | 69951 |
the_viability_of | 0.564 | 32346 |
success_of | 0.560 | 1912 |
the_adequacy_of | 0.558 | 67163 |