| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| the_effectiveness_of | 0.855 | 9595 |
| efficacy_of | 0.822 | 59785 |
| and_efficacy_of | 0.802 | 58080 |
| effectiveness_of | 0.765 | 32347 |
| the_usefulness_of | 0.728 | 34775 |
| efficacy | 0.722 | 12475 |
| its_effectiveness | 0.698 | 59159 |
| their_effectiveness | 0.674 | 65235 |
| and_effectiveness_of | 0.674 | 67700 |
| effectiveness | 0.654 | 5254 |
| the_potency_of | 0.620 | 82410 |
| the_effect_of | 0.610 | 1931 |
| acceptability_of | 0.609 | 72135 |
| the_feasibility_of | 0.608 | 31863 |
| the_potential_benefit_of | 0.600 | 79113 |
| the_validity_of | 0.598 | 20531 |
| the_viability_of | 0.586 | 32346 |
| the_applicability_of | 0.584 | 51868 |
| effect_of | 0.583 | 4061 |
| how_effective | 0.578 | 87974 |
| the_impact_of | 0.577 | 2285 |
| evaluate_the_effectiveness_of | 0.576 | 80821 |
| efficiency_of | 0.569 | 5753 |
| the_appropriateness_of | 0.566 | 61474 |
| and_validity_of | 0.565 | 92780 |