Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
the_effectiveness_of | 0.751 | 9595 |
effectiveness | 0.743 | 5254 |
its_effectiveness | 0.739 | 59159 |
and_effectiveness_of | 0.683 | 67700 |
the_efficacy_of | 0.674 | 20536 |
effectiveness_of | 0.667 | 32347 |
efficacy | 0.624 | 12475 |
their_impact | 0.617 | 27710 |
and_efficacy_of | 0.605 | 58080 |
their_impact_on | 0.589 | 60299 |
the_usefulness_of | 0.586 | 34775 |
efficacy_of | 0.582 | 59785 |
how_effective | 0.576 | 87974 |
their_effect_on | 0.557 | 95747 |
usefulness | 0.550 | 26552 |
efficiency_of | 0.533 | 5753 |
cost-effectiveness | 0.532 | 49879 |
their_capacity_to | 0.521 | 60948 |
be_ineffective | 0.519 | 38568 |
their_limitation | 0.518 | 99282 |
their_implementation | 0.517 | 30844 |
their_strength_and | 0.507 | 68822 |
evaluate_the_effectiveness_of | 0.507 | 80821 |
its_impact | 0.504 | 43710 |
ineffective | 0.504 | 17095 |