| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| cost_saving | 0.705 | 17397 |
| save_time | 0.669 | 38902 |
| save_time_and_money | 0.617 | 76807 |
| increase_efficiency | 0.578 | 26264 |
| cost_reduction | 0.569 | 37456 |
| cycle_time | 0.566 | 81645 |
| increase_productivity | 0.559 | 25036 |
| travel_time | 0.555 | 26353 |
| reduce_cost | 0.555 | 15420 |
| cost_efficiency | 0.554 | 76154 |
| improve_productivity | 0.553 | 48263 |
| cost_effective | 0.546 | 15101 |
| ease_of_use | 0.539 | 19645 |
| saving | 0.537 | 3298 |
| environmental_benefit | 0.534 | 69059 |
| operational_efficiency | 0.531 | 54519 |
| improve_efficiency | 0.531 | 31393 |
| cost_effectiveness | 0.531 | 58138 |
| save_you_time | 0.530 | 69400 |
| convenience | 0.529 | 6993 |
| efficiency | 0.526 | 2199 |
| great_efficiency | 0.515 | 84913 |
| more_efficient | 0.514 | 7315 |
| cost-effectiveness | 0.510 | 49879 |
| savings | 0.509 | 78204 |