| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| user_friendly | 0.869 | 26839 |
| and_easy_to_use | 0.812 | 20816 |
| easy_to_use | 0.809 | 14474 |
| easy-to-use | 0.802 | 29712 |
| be_easy_to_use | 0.696 | 33598 |
| intuitive | 0.683 | 11817 |
| and_easy_to_understand | 0.667 | 73421 |
| an_easy_to_use | 0.650 | 63883 |
| cost-efficient | 0.637 | 81922 |
| customizable | 0.637 | 24879 |
| cost-effective | 0.634 | 12088 |
| straightforward | 0.634 | 13032 |
| accessible | 0.624 | 3331 |
| web-based | 0.623 | 24779 |
| more_intuitive | 0.622 | 97210 |
| easy_to_understand | 0.621 | 50534 |
| cost_effective | 0.619 | 15101 |
| convenient | 0.617 | 5972 |
| easy_to_read | 0.616 | 68877 |
| easily_accessible | 0.615 | 33182 |
| efficient | 0.615 | 2805 |
| streamlined | 0.604 | 32429 |
| it_be_easy_to_use | 0.595 | 80387 |
| hassle-free | 0.589 | 79117 |
| easy_to_install | 0.584 | 64618 |