| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| user-friendly | 0.869 | 21921 |
| easy_to_use | 0.812 | 14474 |
| and_easy_to_use | 0.807 | 20816 |
| easy-to-use | 0.731 | 29712 |
| be_easy_to_use | 0.701 | 33598 |
| and_easy_to_understand | 0.673 | 73421 |
| easy_to_understand | 0.658 | 50534 |
| an_easy_to_use | 0.653 | 63883 |
| intuitive | 0.640 | 11817 |
| easy_to_read | 0.639 | 68877 |
| web_base | 0.636 | 49361 |
| cost_effective | 0.626 | 15101 |
| more_intuitive | 0.626 | 97210 |
| it_be_easy_to_use | 0.618 | 80387 |
| accessible | 0.606 | 3331 |
| web-based | 0.597 | 24779 |
| hassle_free | 0.596 | 90690 |
| efficient | 0.594 | 2805 |
| easy_to_install | 0.591 | 64618 |
| customizable | 0.588 | 24879 |
| user_interface | 0.583 | 8180 |
| cost_efficient | 0.582 | 94706 |
| more_interactive | 0.580 | 79694 |
| easily_accessible | 0.573 | 33182 |
| graphical_user_interface | 0.570 | 68943 |