Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
user-friendly | 0.869 | 21921 |
easy_to_use | 0.812 | 14474 |
and_easy_to_use | 0.807 | 20816 |
easy-to-use | 0.731 | 29712 |
be_easy_to_use | 0.701 | 33598 |
and_easy_to_understand | 0.673 | 73421 |
easy_to_understand | 0.658 | 50534 |
an_easy_to_use | 0.653 | 63883 |
intuitive | 0.640 | 11817 |
easy_to_read | 0.639 | 68877 |
web_base | 0.636 | 49361 |
cost_effective | 0.626 | 15101 |
more_intuitive | 0.626 | 97210 |
it_be_easy_to_use | 0.618 | 80387 |
accessible | 0.606 | 3331 |
web-based | 0.597 | 24779 |
hassle_free | 0.596 | 90690 |
efficient | 0.594 | 2805 |
easy_to_install | 0.591 | 64618 |
customizable | 0.588 | 24879 |
user_interface | 0.583 | 8180 |
cost_efficient | 0.582 | 94706 |
more_interactive | 0.580 | 79694 |
easily_accessible | 0.573 | 33182 |
graphical_user_interface | 0.570 | 68943 |