| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| efficient | 0.745 | 2805 |
| highly_efficient | 0.720 | 40901 |
| an_efficient | 0.653 | 16489 |
| very_effective | 0.606 | 61472 |
| the_most_efficient | 0.585 | 31596 |
| most_efficient | 0.578 | 72519 |
| very_fast | 0.573 | 20786 |
| more_efficient | 0.564 | 7315 |
| very_quick | 0.560 | 95630 |
| very_professional | 0.539 | 87571 |
| highly_effective | 0.539 | 35554 |
| cost-efficient | 0.532 | 81922 |
| high_efficiency | 0.525 | 32026 |
| very_helpful | 0.524 | 31283 |
| a_more_efficient | 0.522 | 42459 |
| dependable | 0.520 | 21638 |
| cost_efficient | 0.517 | 94706 |
| versatile | 0.514 | 11816 |
| reliable | 0.510 | 3190 |
| cost_effective | 0.506 | 15101 |
| and_easy_to_use | 0.505 | 20816 |
| very_useful | 0.501 | 30507 |
| punctual | 0.500 | 84507 |
| very_simple | 0.498 | 26448 |
| very_powerful | 0.493 | 48949 |