| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| a_viable | 0.787 | 31931 |
| be_viable | 0.758 | 43704 |
| economically_viable | 0.718 | 75780 |
| feasible | 0.669 | 16338 |
| sustainable | 0.610 | 2965 |
| workable | 0.609 | 40299 |
| viability | 0.597 | 24164 |
| profitable | 0.586 | 8325 |
| the_viability_of | 0.576 | 32346 |
| a_sustainable | 0.544 | 13754 |
| cost_effective | 0.544 | 15101 |
| marketable | 0.544 | 65527 |
| cost-effective | 0.537 | 12088 |
| plausible | 0.524 | 30555 |
| practicable | 0.517 | 87494 |
| affordable | 0.517 | 3667 |
| achievable | 0.515 | 33132 |
| replicable | 0.514 | 77622 |
| adequate | 0.513 | 8664 |
| be_feasible | 0.509 | 28522 |
| robust | 0.508 | 5571 |
| credible | 0.506 | 13172 |
| scalable | 0.506 | 14958 |
| environmentally_sound | 0.500 | 91157 |
| suitable | 0.500 | 5547 |