SimilarityRank
with_particular_reference_to 0.762 58992
with_special_emphasis_on 0.721 42416
:_a_case_study 0.690 29217
with_emphasis_on 0.683 16046
:_an_analysis_of 0.667 53090
a_comparative_study_of 0.662 74598
and_its_relation_to 0.659 58633
with_particular_emphasis_on 0.653 95522
with_special_focus_on 0.649 77543
and_its_implication_for 0.646 53124
comparative_study_of 0.643 70010
:_implication_for 0.638 29106
,_with_particular_emphasis_on 0.621 67991
and_their_implication_for 0.617 88839
:_insight_from 0.617 98966
and_their_relation_to 0.616 97318
and_its_influence_on 0.612 80265
with_a_special_focus_on 0.611 38368
Key_word_: 0.609 57702
and_their_impact_on 0.606 30075
and_their_influence_on 0.602 95467
(_editor_._) 0.594 16161
:_evidence_from 0.588 33019
his_research_interest_include 0.588 43211
and_its_effect_on 0.585 30031