| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| Low-cost | 0.846 | 65611 |
| Inexpensive | 0.829 | 39571 |
| cost-effective | 0.812 | 8865 |
| Efficient | 0.772 | 25811 |
| Economical | 0.763 | 60179 |
| Straightforward | 0.760 | 63697 |
| cost-efficient | 0.752 | 44027 |
| Uncomplicated | 0.749 | 94739 |
| Advantages | 0.747 | 17840 |
| Reliable | 0.744 | 28037 |
| Dependable | 0.740 | 78422 |
| Cheaper | 0.730 | 42623 |
| Efficiently | 0.729 | 88856 |
| Costly | 0.724 | 73302 |
| Expensive | 0.716 | 33481 |
| High-quality | 0.711 | 66159 |
| low-cost | 0.710 | 11460 |
| Reasonably | 0.709 | 70073 |
| Utilized | 0.703 | 88640 |
| inexpensive | 0.700 | 5701 |
| Utilizing | 0.696 | 20415 |
| Effectively | 0.693 | 26779 |
| Acquiring | 0.688 | 31242 |
| Affordable | 0.688 | 11651 |
| Implementing | 0.687 | 28260 |