Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
Low-cost | 0.846 | 65611 |
Inexpensive | 0.829 | 39571 |
cost-effective | 0.812 | 8865 |
Efficient | 0.772 | 25811 |
Economical | 0.763 | 60179 |
Straightforward | 0.760 | 63697 |
cost-efficient | 0.752 | 44027 |
Uncomplicated | 0.749 | 94739 |
Advantages | 0.747 | 17840 |
Reliable | 0.744 | 28037 |
Dependable | 0.740 | 78422 |
Cheaper | 0.730 | 42623 |
Efficiently | 0.729 | 88856 |
Costly | 0.724 | 73302 |
Expensive | 0.716 | 33481 |
High-quality | 0.711 | 66159 |
low-cost | 0.710 | 11460 |
Reasonably | 0.709 | 70073 |
Utilized | 0.703 | 88640 |
inexpensive | 0.700 | 5701 |
Utilizing | 0.696 | 20415 |
Effectively | 0.693 | 26779 |
Acquiring | 0.688 | 31242 |
Affordable | 0.688 | 11651 |
Implementing | 0.687 | 28260 |