| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| high-quality | 0.882 | 7274 |
| top-quality | 0.793 | 35331 |
| quality | 0.792 | 366 |
| good-quality | 0.789 | 70460 |
| highest-quality | 0.715 | 77404 |
| Cost-effective | 0.711 | 95459 |
| Supplying | 0.704 | 68440 |
| High-end | 0.698 | 80145 |
| highquality | 0.691 | 72971 |
| Inexpensive | 0.684 | 39571 |
| higher-quality | 0.675 | 74036 |
| Low-cost | 0.667 | 65611 |
| Providing | 0.665 | 12567 |
| Utilizing | 0.661 | 20415 |
| State-of-the-art | 0.655 | 82768 |
| inexpensive | 0.649 | 5701 |
| Quality | 0.648 | 4998 |
| Exceptional | 0.645 | 30274 |
| Excellent | 0.627 | 8083 |
| well-designed | 0.621 | 27304 |
| excellent | 0.621 | 913 |
| Provide | 0.619 | 9685 |
| affordable | 0.617 | 2395 |
| Exceptionally | 0.617 | 84499 |
| Appropriate | 0.616 | 24759 |