| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| affordably | 0.838 | 46841 |
| inexpensive | 0.830 | 5701 |
| budget-friendly | 0.825 | 65613 |
| low-cost | 0.805 | 11460 |
| cost-effective | 0.791 | 8865 |
| economical | 0.783 | 8601 |
| priced | 0.765 | 4931 |
| cost-efficient | 0.752 | 44027 |
| low-priced | 0.752 | 30811 |
| cheaper | 0.725 | 3859 |
| hassle-free | 0.720 | 25973 |
| pricey | 0.720 | 12795 |
| highly-priced | 0.717 | 60858 |
| budget-conscious | 0.716 | 98198 |
| affordability | 0.712 | 17571 |
| unaffordable | 0.710 | 41162 |
| expensive | 0.709 | 1462 |
| costlier | 0.697 | 57014 |
| high-quality | 0.695 | 7274 |
| top-quality | 0.688 | 35331 |
| high-priced | 0.688 | 27188 |
| pricier | 0.686 | 52577 |
| Cost-effective | 0.685 | 95459 |
| no-cost | 0.682 | 56280 |
| cheapest | 0.672 | 6824 |