| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| beleaguered | 0.709 | 39942 |
| underfunded | 0.689 | 50275 |
| spenders | 0.679 | 65860 |
| unaffordable | 0.678 | 41162 |
| cutbacks | 0.672 | 35302 |
| low-interest | 0.670 | 65828 |
| public-sector | 0.667 | 68467 |
| subsidizing | 0.661 | 44475 |
| hamstrung | 0.652 | 79962 |
| taxpayers | 0.651 | 8105 |
| subsidize | 0.651 | 30596 |
| subsidies | 0.648 | 11123 |
| shortfall | 0.647 | 22604 |
| disincentive | 0.646 | 70120 |
| under-performing | 0.645 | 90163 |
| windfall | 0.643 | 34027 |
| overspending | 0.643 | 54715 |
| shortfalls | 0.640 | 39418 |
| high-cost | 0.639 | 58780 |
| subsidy | 0.639 | 15945 |
| lower-income | 0.639 | 58651 |
| hard-pressed | 0.638 | 43862 |
| funding | 0.638 | 1726 |
| private-sector | 0.636 | 41114 |
| taxpayer-funded | 0.633 | 74264 |