| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| cost-efficient | 0.973 | 44027 |
| efficient | 0.836 | 2049 |
| Cost-effective | 0.812 | 95459 |
| cost-effectively | 0.807 | 51674 |
| low-cost | 0.804 | 11460 |
| affordable | 0.791 | 2395 |
| economical | 0.791 | 8601 |
| feasible | 0.764 | 8722 |
| inexpensive | 0.760 | 5701 |
| cost-saving | 0.759 | 56693 |
| scalable | 0.754 | 17522 |
| effective | 0.752 | 706 |
| affordably | 0.751 | 46841 |
| hassle-free | 0.742 | 25973 |
| reliable | 0.732 | 2758 |
| solutions | 0.722 | 1246 |
| cost-savings | 0.721 | 85880 |
| future-proof | 0.714 | 89543 |
| cost-effectiveness | 0.713 | 43293 |
| user-friendly | 0.705 | 15098 |
| high-quality | 0.704 | 7274 |
| innovative | 0.704 | 2446 |
| costly | 0.702 | 5059 |
| achievable | 0.698 | 14023 |
| robust | 0.696 | 5652 |