Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
cost-effective | 0.973 | 8865 |
efficient | 0.884 | 2049 |
cost-effectively | 0.834 | 51674 |
economical | 0.796 | 8601 |
scalable | 0.783 | 17522 |
low-cost | 0.776 | 11460 |
affordable | 0.752 | 2395 |
Cost-effective | 0.752 | 95459 |
cost-saving | 0.751 | 56693 |
affordably | 0.745 | 46841 |
hassle-free | 0.742 | 25973 |
future-proof | 0.741 | 89543 |
reliable | 0.735 | 2758 |
feasible | 0.734 | 8722 |
environmentally-friendly | 0.731 | 47015 |
user-friendly | 0.730 | 15098 |
environment-friendly | 0.726 | 74445 |
inexpensive | 0.723 | 5701 |
cost-savings | 0.719 | 85880 |
efficiencies | 0.715 | 16247 |
effective | 0.712 | 706 |
energy-efficient | 0.712 | 24948 |
best-in-class | 0.708 | 41489 |
solutions | 0.707 | 1246 |
feature-rich | 0.706 | 57469 |