| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| inexpensive | 0.801 | 5701 |
| cost-efficient | 0.796 | 44027 |
| cost-effective | 0.791 | 8865 |
| affordable | 0.783 | 2395 |
| hassle-free | 0.765 | 25973 |
| efficient | 0.750 | 2049 |
| trouble-free | 0.748 | 45649 |
| environment-friendly | 0.746 | 74445 |
| feasible | 0.744 | 8722 |
| low-cost | 0.739 | 11460 |
| low-priced | 0.739 | 30811 |
| dependable | 0.732 | 12155 |
| highly-priced | 0.729 | 60858 |
| costlier | 0.725 | 57014 |
| doable | 0.702 | 20923 |
| achievable | 0.702 | 14023 |
| reliable | 0.701 | 2758 |
| budget-friendly | 0.698 | 65613 |
| straightforward | 0.696 | 6065 |
| attainable | 0.693 | 19037 |
| Economical | 0.691 | 60179 |
| ecofriendly | 0.687 | 97170 |
| ideal | 0.686 | 1609 |
| uncomplicated | 0.685 | 16373 |
| Cost-effective | 0.684 | 95459 |