Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
cost-efficient | 0.884 | 44027 |
cost-effective | 0.836 | 8865 |
efficiently | 0.760 | 5313 |
Efficient | 0.757 | 25811 |
economical | 0.750 | 8601 |
efficiency | 0.743 | 2593 |
effective | 0.734 | 706 |
reliable | 0.733 | 2758 |
energy-efficient | 0.720 | 24948 |
user-friendly | 0.702 | 15098 |
environment-friendly | 0.702 | 74445 |
cost-effectively | 0.700 | 51674 |
trouble-free | 0.700 | 45649 |
inefficient | 0.699 | 16136 |
robust | 0.698 | 5652 |
dependable | 0.696 | 12155 |
scalable | 0.692 | 17522 |
maintainable | 0.685 | 70440 |
environmentally-friendly | 0.681 | 47015 |
efficiencies | 0.681 | 16247 |
environmentally | 0.679 | 8558 |
simpler | 0.678 | 7156 |
high-efficiency | 0.666 | 53165 |
hassle-free | 0.664 | 25973 |
feasible | 0.654 | 8722 |