| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| accurate | 0.673 | 2597 |
| error-prone | 0.660 | 89981 |
| repeatable | 0.660 | 36201 |
| maintainable | 0.654 | 70440 |
| on-time | 0.650 | 36275 |
| reproducible | 0.648 | 47277 |
| consistent | 0.648 | 2763 |
| trouble-free | 0.646 | 45649 |
| readable | 0.634 | 16671 |
| user-friendly | 0.630 | 15098 |
| reliable | 0.627 | 2758 |
| timely | 0.618 | 5551 |
| errors | 0.616 | 4155 |
| accuracy | 0.615 | 5228 |
| optimized | 0.615 | 10983 |
| end-to-end | 0.599 | 24136 |
| concise | 0.599 | 12863 |
| proofread | 0.593 | 44878 |
| uptime | 0.590 | 31130 |
| ensures | 0.589 | 5654 |
| formatting | 0.585 | 15857 |
| scalable | 0.583 | 17522 |
| reliably | 0.583 | 17753 |
| proofreading | 0.579 | 40616 |
| formatted | 0.579 | 21985 |