| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| optimally | 0.733 | 29906 |
| flexible | 0.727 | 3454 |
| dynamically | 0.720 | 19924 |
| intelligently | 0.713 | 24342 |
| cost-effectively | 0.712 | 51674 |
| adapt | 0.698 | 6229 |
| productively | 0.697 | 36105 |
| efficiently | 0.695 | 5313 |
| innovatively | 0.681 | 87859 |
| adaptable | 0.678 | 18943 |
| autonomously | 0.673 | 59610 |
| scalable | 0.665 | 17522 |
| creatively | 0.655 | 16692 |
| coherently | 0.646 | 66105 |
| individualised | 0.639 | 70501 |
| interactively | 0.638 | 58491 |
| configurable | 0.636 | 32364 |
| effectively | 0.633 | 1957 |
| robustly | 0.631 | 65493 |
| maximally | 0.629 | 67399 |
| fluidly | 0.627 | 68983 |
| synchronously | 0.623 | 96059 |
| customised | 0.622 | 25812 |
| usefully | 0.620 | 48883 |
| collaboratively | 0.619 | 25540 |