| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| top-quality | 0.903 | 35331 |
| High-quality | 0.882 | 66159 |
| highest-quality | 0.870 | 77404 |
| good-quality | 0.839 | 70460 |
| quality | 0.827 | 366 |
| higher-quality | 0.788 | 74036 |
| top-notch | 0.722 | 18920 |
| cost-effective | 0.704 | 8865 |
| affordable | 0.695 | 2395 |
| highquality | 0.694 | 72971 |
| topnotch | 0.686 | 81035 |
| low-cost | 0.684 | 11460 |
| well-designed | 0.683 | 27304 |
| cost-efficient | 0.682 | 44027 |
| leading-edge | 0.677 | 41452 |
| top-of-the-line | 0.671 | 44345 |
| inexpensive | 0.667 | 5701 |
| cutting-edge | 0.666 | 14891 |
| robust | 0.663 | 5652 |
| excellent | 0.663 | 913 |
| high-end | 0.662 | 9163 |
| full-range | 0.655 | 92988 |
| high-performance | 0.652 | 19345 |
| well-made | 0.651 | 43474 |
| providing | 0.651 | 976 |