Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
high-quality | 0.788 | 7274 |
higher-priced | 0.786 | 94220 |
low-quality | 0.757 | 53515 |
higher-end | 0.746 | 55830 |
lower-priced | 0.741 | 86577 |
lower-cost | 0.736 | 60788 |
good-quality | 0.721 | 70460 |
highest-quality | 0.717 | 77404 |
quality | 0.695 | 366 |
High-quality | 0.675 | 66159 |
pricier | 0.670 | 52577 |
top-quality | 0.665 | 35331 |
costlier | 0.654 | 57014 |
low-end | 0.653 | 36695 |
value-added | 0.648 | 24882 |
cheaper | 0.640 | 3859 |
high-end | 0.637 | 9163 |
high-volume | 0.627 | 44184 |
cost-efficient | 0.625 | 44027 |
low-volume | 0.622 | 95902 |
cost-effective | 0.622 | 8865 |
higher | 0.619 | 646 |
high-value | 0.614 | 38940 |
longer-lasting | 0.611 | 77679 |
low-cost | 0.604 | 11460 |