| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| inefficiently | 0.848 | 87268 |
| wasteful | 0.819 | 23002 |
| inefficiency | 0.776 | 36369 |
| uneconomic | 0.753 | 98288 |
| inefficiencies | 0.730 | 37418 |
| energy-intensive | 0.728 | 95480 |
| error-prone | 0.726 | 89981 |
| ineffective | 0.726 | 11789 |
| unproductive | 0.723 | 30468 |
| uncompetitive | 0.714 | 77382 |
| non-productive | 0.713 | 87513 |
| impractical | 0.700 | 23486 |
| redundant | 0.700 | 14338 |
| efficient | 0.699 | 2049 |
| cumbersome | 0.692 | 18980 |
| costly | 0.692 | 5059 |
| sub-optimal | 0.689 | 81280 |
| counter-productive | 0.686 | 47301 |
| unworkable | 0.685 | 52224 |
| outmoded | 0.683 | 53253 |
| inadequate | 0.682 | 8751 |
| counterproductive | 0.677 | 29011 |
| unfeasible | 0.675 | 79556 |
| antiquated | 0.674 | 31647 |
| out-dated | 0.674 | 76198 |