| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| inefficient | 0.848 | 16136 |
| efficiently | 0.711 | 5313 |
| uneconomic | 0.709 | 98288 |
| wasteful | 0.702 | 23002 |
| non-productive | 0.689 | 87513 |
| inefficiency | 0.687 | 36369 |
| inefficiencies | 0.674 | 37418 |
| uncompetitive | 0.672 | 77382 |
| inadequately | 0.668 | 46034 |
| unnecessarily | 0.665 | 19430 |
| expensively | 0.664 | 73358 |
| unproductive | 0.660 | 30468 |
| poorly | 0.656 | 6847 |
| profitably | 0.639 | 36324 |
| productively | 0.639 | 36105 |
| irresponsibly | 0.637 | 67493 |
| needlessly | 0.636 | 30611 |
| optimally | 0.636 | 29906 |
| overloaded | 0.629 | 26409 |
| prohibitively | 0.628 | 45927 |
| energy-intensive | 0.627 | 95480 |
| ineffective | 0.627 | 11789 |
| wastage | 0.626 | 39979 |
| unfeasible | 0.626 | 79556 |
| excessively | 0.625 | 16435 |