Similarity | Rank | |
---|---|---|
inexpensive | 0.826 | 5701 |
affordable | 0.805 | 2395 |
cost-effective | 0.804 | 8865 |
low-priced | 0.782 | 30811 |
Low-cost | 0.779 | 65611 |
cost-efficient | 0.776 | 44027 |
lower-cost | 0.756 | 60788 |
economical | 0.739 | 8601 |
Cost-effective | 0.710 | 95459 |
cheaper | 0.702 | 3859 |
alternative | 0.693 | 1513 |
high-quality | 0.684 | 7274 |
budget-friendly | 0.683 | 65613 |
costlier | 0.670 | 57014 |
hassle-free | 0.669 | 25973 |
no-cost | 0.668 | 56280 |
lower-priced | 0.665 | 86577 |
affordably | 0.661 | 46841 |
environment-friendly | 0.657 | 74445 |
feasible | 0.657 | 8722 |
alternatives | 0.653 | 4617 |
highly-priced | 0.653 | 60858 |
high-priced | 0.653 | 27188 |
expensive | 0.646 | 1462 |
ecofriendly | 0.644 | 97170 |