| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| lower-priced | 0.832 | 86577 |
| higher-priced | 0.807 | 94220 |
| high-cost | 0.783 | 58780 |
| cheaper | 0.758 | 3859 |
| low-cost | 0.756 | 11460 |
| higher-quality | 0.736 | 74036 |
| costlier | 0.725 | 57014 |
| higher-end | 0.697 | 55830 |
| cost-saving | 0.692 | 56693 |
| pricier | 0.679 | 52577 |
| cost-efficient | 0.677 | 44027 |
| cost-effective | 0.669 | 8865 |
| prohibitive | 0.657 | 30633 |
| next-generation | 0.655 | 24407 |
| off-the-shelf | 0.653 | 39328 |
| alternatives | 0.650 | 4617 |
| alternative | 0.648 | 1513 |
| OEMs | 0.645 | 34799 |
| affordable | 0.644 | 2395 |
| high-volume | 0.641 | 44184 |
| cost-savings | 0.638 | 85880 |
| newer | 0.637 | 6665 |
| expensive | 0.632 | 1462 |
| high-demand | 0.631 | 91144 |
| low-end | 0.627 | 36695 |