| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| redundancy | 0.777 | 20198 |
| Redundant | 0.753 | 97060 |
| inefficient | 0.700 | 16136 |
| redundancies | 0.685 | 46387 |
| obsolete | 0.681 | 14225 |
| superfluous | 0.675 | 29678 |
| overloaded | 0.669 | 26409 |
| non-functional | 0.658 | 70619 |
| Redundancy | 0.657 | 79005 |
| unusable | 0.657 | 32318 |
| cumbersome | 0.649 | 18980 |
| duplicative | 0.643 | 82469 |
| error-prone | 0.642 | 89981 |
| non-critical | 0.635 | 98204 |
| unnecessary | 0.634 | 5611 |
| unwieldy | 0.631 | 42045 |
| useless | 0.630 | 6628 |
| disconnected | 0.629 | 16444 |
| reconfiguring | 0.624 | 84156 |
| paging | 0.622 | 44872 |
| unneeded | 0.622 | 36109 |
| out-dated | 0.621 | 76198 |
| non-standard | 0.621 | 39226 |
| infeasible | 0.620 | 96897 |
| centralised | 0.619 | 38851 |