| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| high-cost | 0.746 | 58780 |
| subsidized | 0.741 | 20129 |
| prohibitive | 0.726 | 30633 |
| exorbitant | 0.721 | 28543 |
| unsustainable | 0.713 | 21646 |
| affordable | 0.710 | 2395 |
| underfunded | 0.709 | 50275 |
| skyrocketing | 0.707 | 36913 |
| prohibitively | 0.703 | 45927 |
| middle-income | 0.690 | 45304 |
| subsidizing | 0.680 | 44475 |
| afford | 0.680 | 2697 |
| cash-strapped | 0.678 | 55762 |
| lower-income | 0.677 | 58651 |
| over-priced | 0.675 | 69536 |
| subsidies | 0.674 | 11123 |
| expensive | 0.674 | 1462 |
| unfeasible | 0.671 | 79556 |
| subsidy | 0.670 | 15945 |
| costlier | 0.670 | 57014 |
| overpriced | 0.668 | 22697 |
| uneconomic | 0.665 | 98288 |
| subsidize | 0.663 | 30596 |
| incomes | 0.660 | 11970 |
| subsidised | 0.655 | 46134 |