| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| underutilized | 0.888 | 48611 |
| under-appreciated | 0.728 | 83121 |
| underappreciated | 0.712 | 63848 |
| overused | 0.660 | 39087 |
| overlooked | 0.655 | 8296 |
| underrated | 0.644 | 28507 |
| neglected | 0.617 | 9421 |
| woefully | 0.615 | 33762 |
| under-performing | 0.602 | 90163 |
| unappreciated | 0.589 | 62879 |
| underfunded | 0.588 | 50275 |
| underdeveloped | 0.587 | 36282 |
| underperforming | 0.586 | 46339 |
| redeveloped | 0.584 | 58925 |
| redeveloping | 0.573 | 92387 |
| under-developed | 0.572 | 99728 |
| reliant | 0.571 | 22353 |
| repurposing | 0.570 | 64374 |
| under-served | 0.569 | 80496 |
| redundant | 0.561 | 14338 |
| afterthought | 0.559 | 32530 |
| undervalued | 0.558 | 34353 |
| overburdened | 0.557 | 59671 |
| blighted | 0.554 | 46658 |
| overrated | 0.554 | 33547 |