| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| underused | 0.888 | 60306 |
| under-served | 0.696 | 80496 |
| under-appreciated | 0.694 | 83121 |
| underappreciated | 0.667 | 63848 |
| untapped | 0.663 | 29037 |
| overlooked | 0.647 | 8296 |
| underserved | 0.639 | 24877 |
| revenue-generating | 0.636 | 90269 |
| under-performing | 0.629 | 90163 |
| undeveloped | 0.616 | 29638 |
| repurposing | 0.616 | 64374 |
| underfunded | 0.611 | 50275 |
| underperforming | 0.604 | 46339 |
| redeveloping | 0.602 | 92387 |
| under-developed | 0.602 | 99728 |
| undervalued | 0.601 | 34353 |
| city-owned | 0.601 | 86720 |
| neglected | 0.599 | 9421 |
| woefully | 0.598 | 33762 |
| underdeveloped | 0.596 | 36282 |
| reallocation | 0.595 | 85159 |
| brownfield | 0.593 | 66903 |
| high-demand | 0.590 | 91144 |
| inefficient | 0.588 | 16136 |
| unappreciated | 0.584 | 62879 |