| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| feasible | 0.752 | 8722 |
| alternative | 0.700 | 1513 |
| unfeasible | 0.683 | 79556 |
| cost-efficient | 0.676 | 44027 |
| cost-effective | 0.675 | 8865 |
| workable | 0.671 | 20032 |
| viability | 0.670 | 16237 |
| preferable | 0.668 | 14333 |
| economically | 0.666 | 9956 |
| self-sustaining | 0.659 | 41764 |
| commercially | 0.657 | 12233 |
| alternatives | 0.639 | 4617 |
| sustainable | 0.633 | 3070 |
| low-cost | 0.631 | 11460 |
| unlikely | 0.630 | 4220 |
| replicable | 0.629 | 79173 |
| infeasible | 0.624 | 96897 |
| profitable | 0.624 | 5378 |
| promising | 0.623 | 5933 |
| successful | 0.620 | 902 |
| lower-cost | 0.610 | 60788 |
| possible | 0.607 | 333 |
| Viable | 0.605 | 92123 |
| efficient | 0.604 | 2049 |
| game-changer | 0.599 | 61786 |