| Similarity | Rank | |
|---|---|---|
| well-constructed | 0.790 | 85006 |
| well-thought-out | 0.753 | 85025 |
| user-friendly | 0.747 | 15098 |
| well-thought | 0.722 | 83059 |
| multi-functional | 0.720 | 60821 |
| great-looking | 0.708 | 87196 |
| thought-out | 0.708 | 57033 |
| robust | 0.700 | 5652 |
| well-built | 0.693 | 56258 |
| functional | 0.690 | 3624 |
| well-planned | 0.688 | 54172 |
| well-structured | 0.687 | 73804 |
| well-executed | 0.684 | 75589 |
| high-quality | 0.683 | 7274 |
| professional-looking | 0.679 | 82135 |
| multifunctional | 0.678 | 51654 |
| easy-to-use | 0.676 | 18254 |
| cost-effective | 0.674 | 8865 |
| design | 0.673 | 400 |
| well-crafted | 0.672 | 47811 |
| uncluttered | 0.668 | 45916 |
| well-made | 0.668 | 43474 |
| well-organized | 0.668 | 39742 |
| feature-rich | 0.667 | 57469 |
| cost-efficient | 0.665 | 44027 |